One of the presenting problems there for academics was whether to even talk to the media.
Those of the rationalistic wing ignore, and at least tacitly deny, inspiration in the theological meaning of the term, and without any doctrinal preoccupations, except some hostile to the supernatural, proceed to apply critical tests to the Scriptures, in the same manner as if they were merely human productions.I know a lot of you know the work of our first speaker, who is the chair of the Department of Religious Studies at Boston University. We’re delighted to have Stephen Prothero here with us. It’s great to be here, not just because of the weather.We’ve been wanting to have him here for some time and delighted we could finally have him come and talk to us for our first session. A couple of weeks ago, I was at the American Academy of Religion meetings in San Diego and I was on a panel on religion in the media.as “A selfless and enduring commitment of the will to care about benefit another person by righteous, truthful, and compassionate thoughts, words and actions.” Biblical love has no ulterior motive, nor is it a feeling.It is always thinking of the other person, which in this case is the wife.With the exception of Abbé Loisy and his followers, no Catholic scholar has claimed autonomy or complete independence for criticism, all proceeding on the principle that it cannot validly, and may not lawfully, contradict the established dogmatic teaching of the Church.